December 28, 2008
"You are unmutual, No. 6" One of the "No. Twos" in THE PRISONER
I'm guessing that this has been going on all over America since November 4th. The Talk. The Talk is something like an intervention, although, too late to redeem the sinner in question. The Talk, which I thought would fade away by Thanksgiving, still insinuates itself into conversation between friends or colleagues. As it did between myself and a friend just before Christmas Day.
The Talk always begins, "But don't you wish him well? Don't you want him to succeed?"
"Him," of course, is President-elect Obama, as in from the podium of the President-elect.
In this case, I was hearing The Talk for the second time. Why? Who knows? Perhaps friends and co-workers simply cannot believe that I resisted the impulse to make history. Or rather, the institutional, corporate, and media campaign to stampede me into the corral of history.
The frequencey of The Talk does seem to decrease with the number of invitations to social events. No inquisitions when they've stopped talking to you.
Although the new president is well on his way to exceeding Pres. Clinton's talent for empty nuance; nuance and subtley have rarely distinguished the political campaigns of the past two years. Except in the media coverage.
As long ago as the summer of 2007, I was telling friends and co-workers that tentative impressions from the Times, the Free Press, the Washington Post etc. implied that they were all beating an increasingly excited tattoo for Senator Obama. But most people I knew still believed that Senator Clinton was the media and institutional favorite. I may not have been routing for the Illinois senator, but I knew a favored underdog when the media so quietly signaled one. If the senator began to think he was annointed, it wasn't without encouragement.
Senator Clinton had patrician Republican pedigree, but Senator Obama was a member of the aristocracy of cool. No suprise that one of his cultural heroes is jazzman Miles Davis, and a member of Lawrence Otis Graham's "our crowd," upper middle class blacks. Obama rarely slipped into victim mode. But for Clinton it was always her default position. Not cool. A bit too much moisture around the eyes. Betraying a middle class earnestness and anxiety that Hollywood and New York disdains.
In this final Talk, however, a new word was uttered. "Racism." It wasn't an accusation -- at least I don't think it was --merely a mention of an historic reality that I might just be numb to. That 62 million Americans voted for the new president struck me as clear and historic refutation of that history. And that refutation should have implied that I was free to vote for the Arizona senator, which I admitted I did. Free, that is, to vote my conscience and my experience on a number of issues that the president-elect was either cagey or uncharacteristically clear on. (You bet I remember the God and Guns remark.)
As I say, nuance and subtley were not what was wanted this past November. There's the complicated fact, for example, that the majority of Blacks, Jews, and Hispanics in this country vote in opposition to my own civic and economic values (and, sometimes, cultural and moral beliefs). Acknowledging that shouldn't be an opportunity to consign me to the moral depths occupied by Klansmen and members of White Citizens Councils. And yet...
As it happens, the majority of Blacks and Hispanics did vote for propositions in California and Florida which I support -- reaffirming society's and the Church's belief that marriage should not be re-defined, but remain between a man and a woman. Or at least that there should be a discussion first. In the wake of that democratic victory, there was an occasion to wonder whether one particular group wasn't engaging in racism and bigotry. The "N" and "S" word were shouted with abandon during protests outside black and hispanic churches. Mormons and Catholics were also demonized revealing more cracks in the solidarity of the diverse. The "proposition H8" protesters originated from a group that, admittedly, is small, a subculture of barely 3 percent. And often provincial and incurious about what goes on outside it.
As it happens, I am also pro-Israel. An unpopular position among some acquaintances and co-workers. It was an impolitic opinion in law school and the UAW in New York. Even some Jewish faculty and students seemed intimidated.
Most people don't know, but my friends do, that I was blacklisted in the book industry by the UAW and an editorial director in large part for suggesting a vigorous internship program for minorities at one publishing company. That is, for the insensitivity of pointing out a gap between rhetoric and actions. A social gaffe compounded by the fact that the majority of editors and editorial staff were women and feminists.
That will never be a pleasant memory, but my conversion to Catholicism -- a glacial anc conflicted process by the way -- has brought a certain degree of peace with it. Even as it is a conversion that will make life more uncomfortable, not less.
The Talk could be seen as insulting, condescending. But in the end, perhaps, you can't come home again. Too many years away. Too many experiences. People know someone from a decade or two ago. There are prodigal sons. Then there are prodigal strangers.
But, friends and co-workers may be onto something. Perhaps President-elect Obama -- whose radical pedigree and status in the aristocracy of cool is irrefutable -- is a radical the way most Episcopalians are Christians. It's what you say at parties and write in best-selling books and unread journals. It's a dollar in the Salvation Army bucket at Christmas or a check to the ACLU or HRC or NEA just before tax season. Then, once in power, the status remains quo, no matter how pernicious it is. It's not that the new president will do anything, it's that he'll do nothing to upset the house of special interest lords in America. After all, that's what they've paid him for.
As for the rest of us. We'll move along as instructed. There's nothing to see here.
Sam Macomb